World Model Readiness
Engraved personal-practice instrument

For you

Personal Practice

Module · The honest map of your replaceable work

The Career Exposure Check

Exposure is not a verdict on your worth; it is a map of where the ground is moving. Most people either panic about their whole job or insist none of it is at risk, and both are ways of not looking. This module asks you to look: which of your tasks AI can already do, which still need your judgment, and whether you are moving your time toward the work that keeps its value.

Question 1 of 5 · You mapped your tasks

Have you honestly listed which of your weekly tasks AI can already do?

Not your job title, your tasks: the concrete things you actually spend hours on. Until you break the week into tasks and mark each one, exposure stays an anxiety instead of a plan.

Question 2 of 5 · Judgment vs process

Can you separate the parts of your work that need your judgment from the parts that are process?

Process work is anything with a knowable right answer and a repeatable path; judgment work is where taste, context and accountability decide. The first is what AI takes first, and confusing the two is how people defend the wrong half of their job.

Question 3 of 5 · You are repositioning

Are you actively moving your time toward work AI cannot yet do?

Knowing your exposure means nothing if your calendar stays the same. Repositioning is deliberate: dropping or automating the process work and pulling in more of the judgment, relationship and accountability work that holds its value.

Question 4 of 5 · You invest in skills

Are you investing in skills that get more valuable as AI spreads, not less?

Some skills compound as AI spreads: judgment, framing problems, directing the tools, owning outcomes. Others quietly deflate. Random courses are not a strategy; the question is whether your learning is aimed at what appreciates.

Question 5 of 5 · You tested your replacement

Have you tried to make AI do your own job, to see where it breaks?

The fastest way to learn your real exposure is to point the tools at your own work and watch where they succeed and where they fall apart. It is uncomfortable, which is exactly why most people avoid it and stay wrong about where they stand.

For the statistics · one click each

Three questions for the public picture

These do not affect your score. They feed the anonymised, aggregated statistics; groups under 8 respondents are never shown.

What share of your weekly tasks could AI already do with light supervision?

Under 10 percent
10 to 30 percent
30 to 60 percent
Over 60 percent
I have never counted

Have you changed how you spend your work time because of AI?

No change
Considering it
Started shifting
Reshaped my week
Does not apply

Have you tried to automate a core part of your own job?

Never tried
Thought about it
Tried once
Do it regularly
Prefer not to say

Your context

Used to calibrate the report. Company size and sector remain in the anonymized dataset; your email does not.

What the five levels look like

Every dimension in this assessment is scored 1 to 5. This is what the levels mean, dimension by dimension. The graded report diagnoses where your own answers land and what to do about it.

You mapped your tasks

  1. 1Never looked
  2. 2Vague sense
  3. 3Rough list
  4. 4Task-level audit
  5. 5Audited and dated

At the low end: You cannot manage exposure you have never measured. Spend an hour listing your recurring tasks and mark, honestly, which ones a good AI tool could do today. What good looks like: A dated task-level audit is exactly the right instrument. Redo it every few months; the line between what AI can and cannot do moves faster than your habits.

Judgment vs process

  1. 1Cannot tell
  2. 2Feels blurred
  3. 3Roughly split
  4. 4Clearly separated
  5. 5Separated and tracked

At the low end: If you cannot tell process from judgment, you cannot tell which of your skills are safe. Take three core tasks and name, for each, where a real decision lives versus where you are just executing steps. What good looks like: Knowing exactly where your judgment lives is the whole game. Track how that share of your week changes; the goal is for judgment work to grow, not shrink.

You are repositioning

  1. 1Standing still
  2. 2Thinking about it
  3. 3One small shift
  4. 4Deliberate move underway
  5. 5Repositioned already

At the low end: Awareness without movement is just a nicer kind of worry. Pick one exposed task this month to automate or hand off, and one higher-judgment task to take on in its place. What good looks like: A deliberate move toward durable work is the right response to a shifting map. Keep steering; repositioning is a habit, not a one-time correction.

You invest in skills

  1. 1No investment
  2. 2Random courses
  3. 3Some deliberate learning
  4. 4Targeted skill building
  5. 5Compounding skill stack

At the low end: Standing still on skills while the ground moves is a slow way to fall behind. Choose one capability that gets more valuable as AI spreads and put real hours into it this quarter. What good looks like: A targeted, compounding skill stack is the strongest hedge you can hold. Revisit the aim yearly; the skills that appreciate this year may not be the ones that appreciate next.

You tested your replacement

  1. 1Never dared
  2. 2Avoid the question
  3. 3Casual dabbling
  4. 4Ran real trials
  5. 5Test it regularly

At the low end: Refusing to test your own replacement does not make you safe, it makes you uninformed. Take one real task this week and genuinely try to make AI do it, then study where it breaks. What good looks like: Regularly stress-testing your own job is how you stay ahead of the curve instead of surprised by it. Keep the trials honest; the point is to find the gaps before someone else does.